Free Account

Create a free account to unlock this surface

The page stays visible as a preview, but browsing, search, and graph interactions are reserved for signed-in members.

FIG-0058b. 1985Hong Kong-born (based in Europe)

Yuk Hui

Philosophy of Technology · Chinese Philosophy · Aesthetics · Political Philosophy · Digital Studies

perplexity
Key Works
The Question Concerning Technology in ChinaRecursivity and ContingencyArt and CosmotechnicsOne Hundred Years of Crisis

Role in the Project

Yuk Hui's concept of cosmotechnics — the claim that every culture has its own relationship between cosmos and technics, and that there is no culturally neutral technology — is essential for the project's engagement with AI and digital media. If the Western tradition's relationship between cosmos and technics is one among many possible relationships, then the question of what the Mystery Schools project does with technology is a genuine philosophical question, not merely a practical one.

Yuk Hui

Dates: b. 1985 Domain: Philosophy of Technology, Chinese Philosophy, Aesthetics

Biography

Yuk Hui was born in Hong Kong in 1985. He studied computer engineering before turning to philosophy, receiving his doctorate from Goldsmiths, University of London, under the supervision of Scott Lash. He has been a student and collaborator of Bernard Stiegler — whose framework he inherited, extended, and critically transformed. His work is positioned at the intersection of continental European philosophy (particularly Heidegger and Stiegler), Chinese philosophical traditions (Daoism, Confucianism, Neo-Confucianism), and the philosophy of digital technology. He has held positions at multiple European universities and at the City University of Hong Kong.

His central concept, cosmotechnics, is introduced in The Question Concerning Technology in China (2016) — a deliberate echo of Heidegger's "The Question Concerning Technology." Where Heidegger's essay proposed that modern technology represents a distinctive way of revealing (or concealing) Being — the essence of which is Gestell (enframing, the forcing of everything into calculability and standing-reserve) — Yuk Hui argues that this account, however powerful, treats Western technology as the universal form of technology rather than as one possible relationship between cosmos and technics among others. Each culture has its own cosmotechnics: its own way of relating the cosmic order to the practices of making and transforming.

In the Chinese tradition, Yuk Hui argues, the cosmotechnics is organized around the relationship between Dao (the Way, the ultimate principle of order and change) and Qi (vessel, tool, the concrete implement). The goal of Chinese technological practice — as expressed in craft traditions, in calligraphy, in traditional medicine, in martial arts — is not the domination of nature through calculation but the alignment of human activity with the cosmic order through sensitivity, responsiveness, and what might be called skilled participation. This is not a romantic idealization of Chinese tradition; it is a philosophical analysis of the different questions that different traditions ask about the relationship between human making and the order of things.

The implication for the contemporary situation is significant. If Western modernity's technology is one cosmotechnics among several possible ones, then the globalization of Western technology is not the neutral expansion of an instrumentally superior set of tools but the imposition of a particular cosmic ordering that is displacing other orderings. This is not merely a political critique (colonial technology bad); it is a philosophical claim about what kinds of world-relationship are available or foreclosed by different technological configurations. The digitization of all knowledge and all cultural transmission — including the esoteric traditions that the project is concerned with — is not a neutral process of making information more available; it is the inscription of Western cosmotechnics into the form through which all knowledge will henceforth be transmitted.

Art and Cosmotechnics (2021) is his most accessible work for the project: a series of essays examining what happens to aesthetic experience and to the relationship between art and cosmos under different cosmotechnical conditions. His analysis of the relationship between Chinese mountain-and-river painting and the Daoist understanding of the cosmos is directly relevant to the project's concern with how different traditions encode different relationships between the human and the divine order in their formal practices.

Key Works (in library)

Work Year Relevance
The Question Concerning Technology in China 2016 The foundational statement of cosmotechnics; the critique of technological universalism
Art and Cosmotechnics 2021 Cosmotechnics applied to aesthetic experience; what art does under different cosmic orders
Recursivity and Contingency 2019 The philosophical foundations; organism, machine, and the logic of technical systems

Role in the Project

Yuk Hui gives the project its primary philosophical vocabulary for thinking about the relationship between technology and the initiatory tradition. The project is produced through digital technology — a podcast, distributed online, accessible via streaming — and Yuk Hui's framework demands that this fact be thought through rather than taken for granted. What cosmotechnics is the podcast format? What cosmic order does it inscribe or presuppose? What does the transmission of initiatory content through streaming audio do to that content? These are not questions the project can answer definitively, but Yuk Hui makes them unavoidable. His student relationship to Stiegler also positions him at the intersection of the pharmacological analysis (Stiegler's framework) and the cosmological analysis — exactly where the project needs him.

Key Ideas

  • Cosmotechnics: Every culture has its own relationship between cosmic order and technical practice; there is no culturally neutral technology; Western enframing is one cosmotechnics among several.
  • Dao-Qi Relationship: The specific Chinese cosmotechnics — the alignment of technical practice with the Dao through the use of Qi (vessel-tool); skilled participation rather than domination.
  • The Question Concerning Technology in China: The re-opening of Heidegger's question — not to close it with the same Western answer but to discover how different cosmological frameworks produce different technical questions.
  • Technological Universalism: The false assumption that Western technology is instrumentally superior and culturally neutral, and that its globalization is therefore a neutral process; the philosophical critique of this assumption.
  • Multiple Modernities: The possibility that modernity is not a single trajectory but a space of multiple possible modernities, each organized around a different cosmotechnics — with implications for what a non-Western modernity might look like.

Connections

  • Influenced by: FIG-0013 Heidegger (the question of technology), FIG-0045 Stiegler (the pharmacological framework; teacher-student relationship), Chinese philosophical tradition (Daoism, Neo-Confucianism), Gilbert Simondon
  • Influenced: Contemporary discussions of AI and non-Western philosophy, post-colonial philosophy of technology, digital humanities
  • In tension with: Heideggerian universalism (Heidegger treats Western technology as the universal form), technological universalism in both its liberal and Marxist versions

Agent Research Notes

[AGENT: perplexity | DATE: 2026-03-22] Yuk Hui was born in 1985; specific birth date not publicly documented. The Question Concerning Technology in China was published by Urbanomic (2016). He studied under Stiegler at the Goldsmiths Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy. His work is increasingly discussed in connection with the global AI debate, particularly the question of whether Chinese AI development represents a different cosmotechnical trajectory than Silicon Valley AI. Art and Cosmotechnics was published by the University of Minnesota Press (2021). He maintains an active presence in philosophical journals and public forums; his podcast and lecture recordings are widely available.

0:00
0:00